Australian author Trudi Canavan won an
Aurealis Award in 1999 with her first published story, Whispers of the Mist Children, and hasn’t looked back. The Black Magician Trilogy, her first
fantasy series, garnered international acclaim and she has since written The Age of the Five and the Traitor Spy Trilogy, along with standalone
novel The Magician’s Apprentice. Her
last five books have been Sunday Times bestsellers in the UK. Following the
release of Angel of Storms, the
second instalment in her Millennium’s
Rule series, Trudi spoke with Chris Large about the new book, her detailed world-building,
and the ways in which her technique has been shaped over time by experience and
injury. This interview first appeared in Aurealis #87.
Hi Trudi, welcome to
Aurealis. Your storytelling is very direct – written in plain speech with few
flourishes or embellishments. Is this style something you work on through the
drafting process, or does it come naturally?
Early on
in my writing it was a deliberate choice to write with clarity and pace, but it
quickly became second nature. If I want to write in a slower, dense and
introspective way I really have to make an effort to do so, and not slip back
into my ‘normal’ voice. I can manage it for short stories, but ultimately I
prefer to write the way I do, so I stick with it for novels.
I’m intrigued by the
history of your new book, Angel of Storms, and the Millennium’s Rule series.
You’ve said you originally came up with the idea in
the 90s. Can you tell us a little about that and why the story wasn’t developed
back then?
The writing
advice I’d been given in my teens and 20s was not to wait until I’d heard back
from publishers, but get on with my next book. While The Magicians’ Guild was in publisher inboxes I wrote the first
incarnation of Angel of Storms. The
advice I’d had also said that an author’s first book doesn’t usually find a
publisher, so I ‘stole’ some of what I thought were the best parts of the Black Magician Trilogy [for Angel of
Storms]. As it turned out, my first book did find a publisher, and that left me
with a finished book that might be too similar. Also, the feedback from beta
readers for Angel of Storms suggested
that it wasn’t quite working, though nobody could tell me why. I figured it
needed to go in the bottom drawer for a while.
Over the years I’d think about Angel of Storms and consider how I could change it to remove the ‘stolen’ parts. When I was nearing the end of writing the Traitor Spy Trilogy I had a closer look, and began tweaking and adding to the general concept. With more experience in shaping stories and characters under my belt, I was better able to translate the feedback I’d been given. I realised the borrowed idea from the Black Magician Trilogy I was most worried about wasn’t that similar after all. I’d taken the idea in an entirely different direction. Other similarities were easy to remove or tweak. Even so, it took two rounds of writing up a proposal and submitting it to the publisher before I was satisfied with it.
Over the years I’d think about Angel of Storms and consider how I could change it to remove the ‘stolen’ parts. When I was nearing the end of writing the Traitor Spy Trilogy I had a closer look, and began tweaking and adding to the general concept. With more experience in shaping stories and characters under my belt, I was better able to translate the feedback I’d been given. I realised the borrowed idea from the Black Magician Trilogy I was most worried about wasn’t that similar after all. I’d taken the idea in an entirely different direction. Other similarities were easy to remove or tweak. Even so, it took two rounds of writing up a proposal and submitting it to the publisher before I was satisfied with it.
You’ve structured the
story so that there are both male and female protagonists who are basically the
heroes of their own stories, and it feels as though you’ve been quite careful
to give them equal exposure. What’s the purpose behind the symmetry?
Tyen’s
story initially came to me as a separate book idea, but because I was working
on a proposal for a reshaped Angel of
Storms at the time, it was almost inevitable that I would consider melding
the two together. They suited each other perfectly. But the blend would only
work if the characters had equal weight.
In
particular, I liked the contrast between the characters and their worlds –
Rielle is a spiritual, artistic person, Tyen’s outlook is shaped by reason and
science. Tyen and Rielle are also similar, but in ways that naturally become
obvious when they are taken out of the environment they grew up in, just as two
people from different countries have being foreign travellers in common, when
they meet elsewhere. That shift from difference to similarity fascinates me.
Like when you know two similar-looking people, they seem more like each other
when you see them separately, but when they’re together all you can see are the
differences.
What also
appealed was that nobody could say ‘this is a boy book’ or ‘this is a girl
book’ based entirely on the gender of the main characters. It’s been
interesting to ask readers who they like most, or note which of the characters
reviewers prefer, because it’s been pretty even and I can never predict which
one reviewers will like.
Tyen’s is an
action-packed tale, while Rielle’s begins as a gentle coming of age story which
slowly becomes darker. The link between the two isn’t clear in the first book.
Was that a risk, writing parallel stories with no apparent connectivity for an
entire book?
All plot
decisions are a risk! Either you’re doing what’s been done before and risk the
reader spotting and disliking that, or you’re doing something different and
risk that they won’t like or understand it. Having the two characters lead
separate lives has turned out to be a great source of tension. The most common
question I’m asked is ‘will they meet?’ (Followed by ‘will they get together?’).
If their stories did not relate very much I think it would be a problem, but
each character’s story informs the other’s, in ways that can give the reader
greater insight into what’s going on than either character has.
The series is titled
Millennium’s Rule, but we don’t really discover what this refers to until the
end of book one. You hold back the true nature of your universe and the
direction of the story until much later than is traditional. What are the
benefits of this approach?
I’m always
looking for ways to hold the reader’s interest throughout a series. One of
those is to reveal truths about the world (or universe, in this case) only when
they have the best effect. Laying out everything right at the start means
there’s nothing new to discover. If you are to avoid second book syndrome then
each continuing book in a series must raise the stakes or turn what the reader
knows on its head. And no matter how good the earlier books, if the last one in
a series is a fizzer that’s what it’ll be remembered for.
Your world building
is very detailed – especially with regard to magic and how it works. It must be
a fine line between describing something in so much detail that you remove its
mystique, and giving just enough to keep readers interested. How do you make
that judgement?
I tell my
readers only what they need to know, plus a little extra so it’s not too
obvious when I’m telling them something that will turn out to be vital later.
When I show the reader how magic works, I give examples to make it clear, but I
like to leave some questions unanswered. I leave it up to them to work out how
what they just learned will apply in other situations. I have to be careful,
however, to make sure I don’t give away so much that the ending becomes
obvious.
Millennium’s Rule,
the idea that a powerful sorcerer or ‘Ruler of Worlds’ is replaced every one
thousand years by a more powerful successor, refers to a pattern, or a type of
periodicity. It’s not clear in the story if this is predestined or due to
circumstance. Empires have risen and fallen in our world’s history. Researchers
suggest there is a documentable progression. Is that something you considered
when world-building the series?
The Rule
has been a fun way to play with the fantasy trope of prophecy. I like playing
with the unreliability of history, too, and how some ideas about it become
pervasive, whether they are wrong, or have a grain of truth in it. While the
possibility that civilisations have a predictable life-cycle is not what I’m
exploring here, because the Rule is about one person who could have ruled many
empires, I am touching on something similar: does a person’s lifespan have a
predictable path if it lasts for a very long time?
The Raen is a very
interesting character. Can you tell us a little about what inspired you to
portray him the way you did. He’s certainly not a classic villain – if he is a
villain at all.
I like
writing ‘grey’ characters. The Raen is very much a ruler, capable of the
ruthlessness and compromise that a position of great power requires. Of course,
it’s not clear what his motives are. Revealing glimpses and sowing doubts is
all part of keeping the story going.
You’ve blogged
musical playlists of tracks readers can listen to while reading the books
including bands like Pendulum, Enigma, Moby, and Depeche Mode. How does music
influence your writing process?
I used to
listen to music while writing all the time. Mostly it was to set a mood, but
occasionally a song comes along that seems to say all the right things about a
character or scene. But for the last few series I got out of the habit. Mostly,
I think, because the CD would finish and I’d never get around to putting on
another. Discovering playlists in iTunes a couple of years ago turned that
around. (Yes, I was slow on the uptake with that one). Now I can have hours of
music lined up.
You’ve discussed the
fact that you suffer from RSI in other forums. Writing isn’t really thought of
as a physical activity but writers can suffer injuries from their craft. How
does RSI impact your output?
I used to
be able to write 4,000 to 5,000 words a day, five days a week. Now I’m happy if
I manage 2,000. I can only write four days in a row when my hands aren’t
inflamed. At the same time, I have to take care not to strain my back, too.
I’ve had upper back and neck problems since I was in my late 20s. Lots of
breaks are essential, as well as stretches and icing my hands when they get
sore.
What are your work
arounds?
I’ve become far more efficient at
writing. I’ve always been a plotter and outliner, but now I go to even greater
extremes in planning to make sure I don’t write any more words than I have to.
I even write a short outline of a scene before I write it, so that I know I’m
going in the right direction. There will always be some rewriting and tweaking
of course, but planning means I don’t waste too many taps on the keyboard.
I tried dictation software, but you
have to do so much editing later. The fingers that give me the most grief are
those I use in editing, so the software is only going to make that worse. It’s
another reason to plot carefully, too. These work arounds haven't prevented my
output slowing down, just not as much as it might have, and yet there is a
benefit to writing more efficiently yet taking longer - I have more time to
think about the story, and that is always good for it. After all, despite all
the begging to write faster, readers know a slowly-written good book is better
than a quickly-written bad book.
Comments