Skip to main content

STAR WARS - IMPERIAL IMPRECISION

I wrote the following post for Aurealis Xpress last year. With the release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens imminent, I thought I'd re-post it here. So excited!

It’s long been known that Star Wars: A New Hope contains examples of some of the worst marksmanship in the history of cinema, particularly with respect to the Emperor’s ‘elite’ forces. But how bad were they really? Wouldn’t it be awesome if there was a statistical measure of exactly how astonishingly bad imperial stormtroopers were at hitting their mark?

Well, fortunately, there is. In the United States, where police forces undergo rigorous (well, at least annual) firearms training, statistics are kept, and made available for, exactly the type of public scrutiny in which we are about to indulge.

But first to the question of “How can we calculate the number of shots fired and hits scored by stormtroopers in Star Wars in order to make a valid comparison with real-world figures?” The answer is simple. I counted them. Yes, I did. No, I’m not shitting you. Inspired by the purchase of a brand new TV boasting no less than 55 inches of HD LED OMFGoodness, I took it upon myself to re-watch Star Wars: A New Hope. And just for fun – because that’s how I roll – I decided to count each and every shot fired by stormtroopers in the name of generating an accurate hit-rate for comparison with figures issued by the NYPD. Before we get to the nitty gritty of raw statistics, I’ll briefly touch upon some potential excuses given by simpering Empire apologists for the atrocious stormtrooper hit-rate, and deftly debunk them all.

Empire Apologist: “It’s difficult to see out of stormtrooper helmets.”
In Star Wars: A New Hope Luke disguises himself as a stormtrooper, making the comment: “I can’t see a thing in this helmet,” and you know what? I could almost buy that excuse, if not for the fact that when clone troopers (properly-trained, 1st generation Jango-Fett clones) wearing similar helmets, were ordered to slaughter the Jedi in Revenge of the Sith, they basically mowed them down without missing a trick.

Empire Apologist: “Stormtroopers were under orders to miss.”
Empire sympathizers argue that, at various points throughout episodes 4-6, Vader wanted to either capture the heroes alive, or that he allowed them to escape on purpose. I would like to point out to those sith-loving sycophants, that at the time the heroes were fighting their way out of the Death Star, a certain little droid was carrying the Death Star’s blue prints inside its ‘rusty innards’. Blue prints I’m reasonably certain the Empire (with the benefit of hindsight, or without) would rather the rebels didn’t get their hands on. So no, the ‘ordered to miss’ argument holds no water whatsoever. A previous commenter pointed out that the rebels were allowed to escape the Deathstar, sure. But stormtroopers were trying to kill them at least until they jumped into the trash compactor, because if R2 hadn't revoked the command to crush them...(psst... they'd all be dead).

Empire Apologist: Psychologically, it’s easier to shoot a faceless, dehumanized drone, than a living, breathing person.
Sith-loving sycophants argue that the above catch-phrase completely explains the fact that an untrained hillbilly farm-boy was able to blast numerous faceless stormtroopers into oblivion, while said faceless stormtroopers were unable to even wing the untrained hillbilly farm-boy. I’m calling mindless, incoherent, psychobabble on that. 

So modern technology is a wondrous thing, and in the right hands it can be used to achieve some truly outstanding outcomes. In my hands, however, it has been used to produce a hit-rate for imperial troops vs. rebel heroes in Star Wars: A New Hope. For comparison, I have also produced a hit-rate for rebel heroes vs. imperial troops. The PlayStation 4 has a super-slow-mo function which allowed me (and two helpers whose identities will remain safely anonymous) to keep tallies of: shots fired by stormtroopers, shots fired by rebels, hits registered by stormtroopers, and hits registered by rebels – for each and every encounter. The results are now in. Drum-roll please…

Scorecard:
Stormtrooper Shots Fired: 440
Stormtrooper Hits Scored: 11
Rebel Shots Fired: 247
Rebel Hits Scored: 58

The above figures give us an overall hit-rate for Imperial Stormtroopers of 2.5%, based on shots fired vs. hits registered. The rebel forces, meanwhile, including soldiers, princesses, smugglers and untrained hillbilly farm-boys alike, manage a far more respectable hit rate of 22.6%. So how do these figures compare to real-life law-enforcement? Well, the NYPD’s historical hit-rate comes in at approximately 10%. In more recent times the NYPD have had a little more luck. Figures released several years ago, detailing statistics of encounters between 1998 and 2006 show an improvement in hit-rate to 18% once animal shootings and suicides are removed. Of course the NYPD don’t like to examine figures purely in terms of hit-rates. It looks kinda bad. They prefer to look at it this way:

NYPD Annual Firearms Discharge Report 2011 - Page 63 (PDF 81)

1971-2011
Officers shot and killed by subjects 119
Subjects shot and killed by officers 1049
Kill Ratio 1:9

Officers shot and injured by subjects 661
Subjects shot and injured by officers 2399
Injury Ratio 1:4

Extrapolating to A New Hope
Stormtroopers shot and killed by rebels 58
Rebels shot and killed by Stormtroopers 11
Kill Ratio: 5:1

Immediately apparent is the utterly horrendous number of shootings occurring in New York City, although it should be noted that those figures were collected over a 40 year period. Another incredible statistic is that there are no stormtrooper injuries. I mean, literally none. It’s a bizarre, and long overlooked fact, that Imperial forces simply do not suffer injuries. Every single encounter is a life or death equation for a storrmtrooper. Injuries are not an option. A zero injury rate also means, of course, that the Empire would not require field medics for its forces. Happy days for Palpatine.
Digging a little deeper into the numbers, if you were a criminal involved in a shootout with police in New York City, whose law enforcement boasts a modest 18% hit-rate, you could potentially dodge a few shots, but you would also be nine times more likely to die in the exchange than you would be to kill a single police officer.

If you were a rebel involved in an altercation with stormtroopers, on the other hand, you could reasonably expect to take out up to four of them without any problem at all. With two or three friends you could probably take on around 12-15 imperial troops safely. And no need to worry about injured troops inconveniently regaining consciousness and rejoining the fight. When a Stormtrooper goes down, he goes down permanently.



To put the above figures into context, B.P Hughes (1969) estimated that during the Napoleonic Wars (specifically at Albuera, 1800s), British infantry managed a hit-rate of around 5% from a distance of 100 yards. There was a common saying among musketeers of the era that “To kill a man required expenditure of an amount of lead equal to his weight.” Okay, so lead is heavy, but still… dat a lot o’ lead. To add even further context:

  • ·         French soldiers during the Napoleonic Wars were said to be so hastily trained that they “couldn’t hit a cow’s ass with a banjo”;
  • ·         misfire rates of up to 20% were common;
  • ·         lead shot was not fitted tightly to the barrel of muskets resulting in unpredictable trajectories;
  • ·         plumes of gun-smoke sweeping the battlefield made it impossible to tell friend from foe;
  • ·         and to top it all off, line infantry had no idea of the range of their weapons, and most were not even taught to aim before firing.  
     Yet, astonishingly, imperial stormtroopers managed only half the hit-rate of British infantry fighting under such conditions. I mean, it’s just totally mind boggling that anyone could possibly be that bad. To put it another way, elite imperial forces achieved a worse hit-rate than untrained laborers wielding weapons which were difficult to load, impossible to aim, and which misfired 20% of the time. Quite a feat. In fact, had I not witnessed it with my own eyes, I wouldn’t have believed it possible. At the very least it shows that for most stormtroopers, their hearts simply aren’t in the job. But are they the most incompetent gun toting villains in the Star Wars universe?

Unbelievably, the answer is no. They’re not. The guy with the worst aim in the Star Wars universe is this guy, who couldn’t hit a stationary target from a distance of two feet. Proof positive that all the technology in the galaxy can’t help you if you’re just that bad.  


I wonder how Redcoats in the Napoleonic Wars would have fared against the French had they been provided with laser blasters. At least 2.5% better than stormtroopers I guess, but then, that’s not really saying much now is it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Flies in the Soup: John Scalzi Part 2

  Interview: John Scalzi Part 2 By Chris Large Interview first appeared in Aurealis #82. Welcome back John. At the moment your new book Lock In, [discussed in the last issue] is a standalone novel. Are you considering writing more in this world? Or is this it? No! I’d be happy to write more in this world if there was a desire from my publisher and from my audience. I don’t ever write anything but standalone novels. Old Man’s War was a standalone novel. I wrote that one book, right? And then it took off and my editor said, “You need to write another one,” and gave me some money. I said “Okay. I see how this works.” That’s how Old Man’s War became a series. Android’s Dream was supposed to be a series. I’d signed a contract for a second book but when I started writing it, it was terrible so I stopped doing that and wrote something else. So Lock In is currently a standalone book but if my publisher comes to me and says, “Yeah, I want you to write the second ...

Also -This CSFG Publishing Thing Happened...

CSFG Publishing provides Aussie spec fic writers with a semi-regular outlet for the expression of some pretty awesome ideas. Earlier this year I learned that one of my stories would be appearing in The Never Never Land - their latest anthology. They made me work for it though. And that's something I really appreciated about this process. A lot of publishers out there are happy to accept or reject your work, and a few will even offer a bit of free advice, but there aren't many who'll take the time to bring a slightly under-par story up to scratch. The reason for this is that working with authors can be difficult. We're a tricky bunch and some of us are protective of our babies. I'll be honest and come right out and say, I'm not. Frankly, I'll do anything to make a sale (within reason). Aside from writing something offensive, I will make any changes requested if a publisher shows even a skerrik of interest in my work. So that's the tale of my contrib...

Flies in the Soup: Thoraiya Dyer

Interview: Thoraiya Dyer By Chris Large Australian author Thoraiya Dyer spoke with me about her award-winning short story Wine, Women and Stars , her recent three book deal with Tor, the purpose of writing awards, and her no-holes-barred determination to put words to page. This interview first appeared in Aurealis #84. Welcome back to Aurealis Thoraiya, and a huge congratulations on winning your third Aurealis Award at the 2015 ceremony. You now have two awards for fantasy and a third for science fiction. In your own words you were ‘a bit weepy’ when you accepted the 2015 gong. What does it mean to you to win awards for your writing? I guess it depends on how confident you’re feeling in your skills at the time. I’ve been writing short  fiction for a while now but also, in the background, I’ve been writing novels. The reason I was so weepy about that particular award was because last year my husband lost his job and the bank took our house, so we were fo...